A reality that teaches magic to believe in magic, instead of magic is a magic that doesn’t teach reality to reject reality because of reality. A magic that doesn’t teach reality to reject reality because of reality is magic being the inability to inspire reality to reject reality because of reality.
The inability to inspire reality to reject reality because of reality is the inability to inspire reality to reject itself because of itself – the inability to inspire the support of self because of self.
Magic is the inability to get the support of the self because of the self, which can be taken to mean that magic lacks the power to get the support of the internal because of the internal. Which leads to the matter of the internal.
A magic that lacks the power to get the support of the internal because of the internal is a power that lacks itself to get itself from the internal from the internal; from the internal from the internal is the external from the internal – the external from the internal is in the internal.
A power that lacks itself to get itself in the internal, is a weakness that has itself to get itself in the internal. A weakness that has itself to get itself in the internal is a corruption that has itself to get itself in a purity – a purity that lacks itself to get itself out of a corruption.
A purity that lacks itself to get itself out of an evil is a purity that has evil to lose evil in a purity; a purity that has evil to lose evil in a purity is a purity that has evil to gain purity in a purity – a goodness that uses evil in order to gain a goodness that’s without evil.
A goodness that uses evil in order to create a goodness that’s exempt from evil is a goodness that’s exempt from evil so that a goodness can be created which is exempt from evil.
A goodness that’s not evil so that a goodness can be created that’s not evil is a goodness that’s good so that another goodness is good.
A goodness that’s good so that a different goodness is good is a goodness that’s real so that a real goodness is real.
A goodness that’s real so that a real goodness is real is a goodness that’s exposed so that a real goodness is exposed; a goodness that’s exposed is an exposure of evil, and an exposure of evil so that a real goodness is exposed is an exposure of evil so that an exposed goodness is exposed.
An exposure of evil so that an exposed goodness is exposed is a criticism of evil so that a weakened goodness isn’t sympathetic; a criticism of evil so that a sympathetic goodness isn’t sympathetic is a support of morality so that an unsympathetic evil is moral.
Amityville 2: The Possession is about God’s true mission, and about God’s true desire being to create the worst evil that’s imaginable – and is one of the greatest movies of all time.
To close the review, I’ll just add that Amityville 2: The Possession represents the idea that art and movies have no right to prove why it is that they’re meant to be created.
